INDEPENDENT AUTOMOTIVE NEWSGLOBAL PERSPECTIVE / AUSTRALIAN EDITION
TDCNTHE DAILY
CAR NEWS.

The road ahead.
Every day.

RSS ↗
Latest/Industry

332 original articles

Industry / TDCN ORIGINAL

BMW Brilliance reportedly cuts 1,800 Shenyang jobs as China sales slide

The reported reduction, about a tenth of the joint venture's workforce, begins on November 2 and has not been confirmed by BMW.

Image: Motor1

BMW Brilliance Automotive has reportedly begun cutting around 1,800 jobs at its Shenyang operations in China, with the reductions starting on November 2. The figure is roughly 10 percent of the joint venture's headcount.

BMW has not publicly confirmed the cuts, so the scale and scope remain unverified by the company. Most of the affected workers are said to be frontline production staff, with some administrative roles included.

What the reported severance looks like

Departing employees are reportedly being offered an N+5 severance formula, where N is tied to pre-tax monthly salary for each year of service and the extra five months are paid at base salary, excluding bonuses. That is more generous than the standard N baseline, though still short of what some workers expected given the company's German footprint.

The cuts did not come out of nowhere. BMW Brilliance reportedly slowed hiring and let contracts lapse over the past three years before this round began. The joint venture dates to 2003 with Brilliance Group, and BMW has controlled it since a 2022 stake increase.

A steep drop in Chinese demand

The timing tracks a sharp deterioration in BMW's China business. Third-quarter deliveries fell 6.3 percent year over year to 551,075 vehicles worldwide, but China dropped about 25 percent in the same quarter as competition from local brands intensified.

Combined BMW and Mini deliveries in China for the first nine months of 2026 reached 376,128 vehicles, down 21.8 percent on the same stretch a year earlier. China's share of BMW's global sales mix slipped from 29.2 percent in 2023 to 25.4 percent in 2025 as domestic brands took a bigger slice of the country's EV and hybrid market.

That matters because Shenyang is not a marginal site: it is where BMW builds for China, and a quarter of its global volume walking away is the kind of shift that shows up on production lines before it shows up in guidance.

Profit guidance cut twice in 2026

BMW Group has cut its 2026 Automotive segment profit outlook twice this year. Guidance moved from an original 4 to 6 percent EBIT margin to a 1 to 3 percent range in June, then to negative 0.5 percent to positive 0.5 percent in November, with the latest reduction linked to expanded portfolio and structural measures tied to phasing out older hardware.

The company still expects its automotive margin before those one-time measures to stay above 2.0 percent, and it now guides to a moderate decrease in 2026 deliveries versus last year. BMW has not clarified whether the Shenyang job cuts sit inside those structural measures.

Silence is becoming the norm

BMW Brilliance had issued no official statement on the layoffs as of the report, following a pattern BMW has shown with other workforce reductions, including a reported voluntary exit program that also went unconfirmed for weeks. Jaguar Land Rover took a similar approach earlier this year with its own voluntary departure offer, which it declined to detail publicly until pressed.

BMW has made other workforce moves abroad recently, including cuts tied to its 8,000 planned job reductions in Germany and a separate round of management-level cuts announced as part of a broader strategy shift, though neither has been formally linked to the Shenyang layoffs.

The wider German industry is doing the same arithmetic. Volkswagen circulated an internal memo discussing layoffs affecting up to 100,000 positions globally, while Porsche has reportedly weighed cutting roughly 5,000 jobs as margins tighten.

For drivers and car buyers, the practical read is that BMW's China squeeze is being answered with cost cuts rather than a retreat: the Neue Klasse ramp-up and the phasing out of older hardware are the stated priorities, and the Shenyang reductions look like the production side of that same pivot. Whether they are formally part of it has not been announced.

Open this article ↗
Electric / TDCN ORIGINAL

Conservation-area EV owners left out of relaxed home charger planning rules

Nearly two million households in England sit inside conservation areas that the new permitted development rights do not cover, and Oxfordshire has paused new applications while it works out what applies.

Electric car drivers living in England's conservation areas are not covered by the government's newly relaxed planning process for home chargers, meaning many still face extra cost and delay to install cross-pavement charging equipment. Historic England told Autocar that nearly two million households sit within conservation areas across England, and those boundaries are excluded from the new permitted development rights that make it easier for motorists without driveways to install cross-pavement charging infrastructure.

For residents without off-street parking inside those areas, planning permission may still be needed for both the charger and the pavement channel. Historic England does not hold data on how many conservation-area homes lack driveways, but the national average is around 40%.

Oxfordshire pauses applications while it seeks clarity

Oxfordshire County Council, which Historic England says contains 260 conservation areas, told Autocar it was "temporarily pausing new applications from residents" in these protected locations. The council said it was also holding applications that had been conditionally approved, rather than risk residents incurring unnecessary planning costs, and was working with local planning authorities to clarify the requirements for homes in protected locations. A spokesperson said applications would reopen "when these matters are resolved".

Shayne Rees of Gul-e, which installs cross-pavement charging channels for Oxfordshire County Council, said a few dozen applications had been affected by the council's decision. He said the council was trying to get on "rock solid ground" before advising residents about the new rules, and put the wait at "days and weeks" rather than months. The council has not given a fixed reopening date, so the length of the pause has not been announced.

Hertfordshire keeps assessing cases individually

Hertfordshire County Council, which is running a cross-pavement charging trial with St Albans City and District Council, is taking a different route. It said it would "continue to consider applications for cross-pavement charging channels on a case-by-case basis", including those in conservation areas.

The council said it would add a step to its initial assessment to check whether an applicant lived in one of St Albans' 19 conservation areas. If so, they would be advised to obtain the necessary planning approvals and directed to the relevant local planning authority. Of the three such applications so far, one had been approved and the other two were still being considered.

According to AA president Edmund King, Hertfordshire County Council charges a £200 non-refundable assessment fee, while installing a pavement channel normally costs £1200 after the subsidy. Residents in conservation areas also have to pay for planning permission for the charger itself.

Planning permission can add months and deter buyers

Michael Goulden, founder and CEO of cross-pavement charging company Kerbo Charge, warned that the residual planning requirements could put motorists off buying an electric car. "There are already deterrents when people think about going electric," he said, adding that people are leaving behind something they know for something new. Getting planning permission "could take up to three months", he said, though it "can be a little quicker".

Goulden wants the applications simplified. "What we don't want people to do is have to submit architectural drawings or in extreme cases carry out wildlife impact assessments," he said, suggesting instead that residents submit a marked-up photograph showing where the charger and pavement channel would go.

The extra step matters because home charging is the cheapest and most convenient way most EV owners charge, and the households affected are precisely those without a driveway who depend on cross-pavement channels. Leaving them under the old regime keeps a planning hurdle in place for the drivers the relaxed rules were meant to help.

Historic England weighs guidance changes

Historic England said it was "supportive of initiatives to design installations that are compatible with the historic character of conservation areas" and was considering changes to its guidance. It has not confirmed what those changes will be, so any revision to the rules for conservation areas has not been announced.

King argued for a proportionate middle path. "There obviously needs to be a balance between protecting our historic streets and helping people make the switch to electric, but these two objectives shouldn't be mutually exclusive," he said, adding that with discreet chargers and properly installed pavement channels, councils and government should be able to develop a simpler approach. He warned against creating "a two-tier system where having a driveway, or simply living on the wrong historic street, determines whether you can easily access" home charging.

The government's plan to streamline the charger installation planning process was announced last month and has raised questions about how the new rules will work in conservation areas in Oxfordshire and Hertfordshire, where councils already run cross-pavement charging schemes. Until councils and Historic England settle the detail, drivers in protected streets remain on the slower, costlier route.

Open this article ↗

Keep scrolling to read the next story.

Older articles →