INDEPENDENT AUTOMOTIVE NEWSGLOBAL PERSPECTIVE / AUSTRALIAN EDITION
TDCNTHE DAILY
CAR NEWS.

The road ahead.
Every day.

RSS ↗
Latest/Electric

331 original articles

Electric / TDCN ORIGINAL

Conservation-area EV owners left out of relaxed home charger planning rules

Nearly two million households in England sit inside conservation areas that the new permitted development rights do not cover, and Oxfordshire has paused new applications while it works out what applies.

Electric car drivers living in England's conservation areas are not covered by the government's newly relaxed planning process for home chargers, meaning many still face extra cost and delay to install cross-pavement charging equipment. Historic England told Autocar that nearly two million households sit within conservation areas across England, and those boundaries are excluded from the new permitted development rights that make it easier for motorists without driveways to install cross-pavement charging infrastructure.

For residents without off-street parking inside those areas, planning permission may still be needed for both the charger and the pavement channel. Historic England does not hold data on how many conservation-area homes lack driveways, but the national average is around 40%.

Oxfordshire pauses applications while it seeks clarity

Oxfordshire County Council, which Historic England says contains 260 conservation areas, told Autocar it was "temporarily pausing new applications from residents" in these protected locations. The council said it was also holding applications that had been conditionally approved, rather than risk residents incurring unnecessary planning costs, and was working with local planning authorities to clarify the requirements for homes in protected locations. A spokesperson said applications would reopen "when these matters are resolved".

Shayne Rees of Gul-e, which installs cross-pavement charging channels for Oxfordshire County Council, said a few dozen applications had been affected by the council's decision. He said the council was trying to get on "rock solid ground" before advising residents about the new rules, and put the wait at "days and weeks" rather than months. The council has not given a fixed reopening date, so the length of the pause has not been announced.

Hertfordshire keeps assessing cases individually

Hertfordshire County Council, which is running a cross-pavement charging trial with St Albans City and District Council, is taking a different route. It said it would "continue to consider applications for cross-pavement charging channels on a case-by-case basis", including those in conservation areas.

The council said it would add a step to its initial assessment to check whether an applicant lived in one of St Albans' 19 conservation areas. If so, they would be advised to obtain the necessary planning approvals and directed to the relevant local planning authority. Of the three such applications so far, one had been approved and the other two were still being considered.

According to AA president Edmund King, Hertfordshire County Council charges a £200 non-refundable assessment fee, while installing a pavement channel normally costs £1200 after the subsidy. Residents in conservation areas also have to pay for planning permission for the charger itself.

Planning permission can add months and deter buyers

Michael Goulden, founder and CEO of cross-pavement charging company Kerbo Charge, warned that the residual planning requirements could put motorists off buying an electric car. "There are already deterrents when people think about going electric," he said, adding that people are leaving behind something they know for something new. Getting planning permission "could take up to three months", he said, though it "can be a little quicker".

Goulden wants the applications simplified. "What we don't want people to do is have to submit architectural drawings or in extreme cases carry out wildlife impact assessments," he said, suggesting instead that residents submit a marked-up photograph showing where the charger and pavement channel would go.

The extra step matters because home charging is the cheapest and most convenient way most EV owners charge, and the households affected are precisely those without a driveway who depend on cross-pavement channels. Leaving them under the old regime keeps a planning hurdle in place for the drivers the relaxed rules were meant to help.

Historic England weighs guidance changes

Historic England said it was "supportive of initiatives to design installations that are compatible with the historic character of conservation areas" and was considering changes to its guidance. It has not confirmed what those changes will be, so any revision to the rules for conservation areas has not been announced.

King argued for a proportionate middle path. "There obviously needs to be a balance between protecting our historic streets and helping people make the switch to electric, but these two objectives shouldn't be mutually exclusive," he said, adding that with discreet chargers and properly installed pavement channels, councils and government should be able to develop a simpler approach. He warned against creating "a two-tier system where having a driveway, or simply living on the wrong historic street, determines whether you can easily access" home charging.

The government's plan to streamline the charger installation planning process was announced last month and has raised questions about how the new rules will work in conservation areas in Oxfordshire and Hertfordshire, where councils already run cross-pavement charging schemes. Until councils and Historic England settle the detail, drivers in protected streets remain on the slower, costlier route.

Open this article ↗
Industry / TDCN ORIGINAL

Mercedes-Benz pushes US GLC production start to May 2030

The next-generation GLC was due to be built in Alabama from late 2027, so the revised date keeps a large share of US-market cars on EU import duty for longer.

Image: Motor1

Mercedes-Benz has moved the start of next-generation GLC assembly at its Vance, Alabama plant from late 2027 to May 2030, a delay of roughly thirty months. The company confirmed the new date, telling Motor1: "Production has been rescheduled for May 2030".

Automotive News first reported the change, citing people familiar with the automaker's planning, and Mercedes has not publicly explained what drove it.

What changes at Vance

The original plan had the next-generation GLC rolling out of Alabama in the fourth quarter of 2027. That target is gone, replaced by a start date more than thirty months later.

The delay applies to the next-generation model, not to every GLC sold in the US. The current GLC already appears on plant lists for Vance alongside the GLE, GLS and the electric EQE and EQS SUVs, so at least part of US GLC output is already localised.

In spring 2026 Mercedes and state officials announced roughly $4 billion in new investment for the Vance operation tied to future SUV programmes, explicitly naming the GLC alongside updated GLE and GLS models. Once the expanded GLC line is running under that plan, the site's annual output is expected to top 280,000 vehicles a year.

Mercedes expects to build around 50,000 GLCs in the first 12 months of the new US line, though it has not tied that figure to a specific calendar year. Vance has built Mercedes SUVs since the 1990s, and the three-year slip changes the timeline for the expansion rather than the decision to build the GLC there.

The tariff arithmetic behind the wait

Mercedes has not named a single cause for the rescheduling, and the reporting available stops short of one. The practical effect is clearer: while the expanded Alabama capacity waits until 2030, a large share of GLC volume for the US still has to arrive from Europe.

Those imports carry the 15 percent combined tariff now applied to passenger vehicles from the European Union under the current US-EU trade framework. For a model built in the hundreds of thousands annually, that exposure compounds with every model year the delay stretches on.

That matters because the GLC is a volume model, not a niche import. Each year the Alabama line stays dark is another year of duty paid on cars that were meant to be built stateside, which is the kind of recurring cost that shows up in pricing and specification decisions long before it shows up in a press release.

A US footprint that keeps growing, slowly

Mercedes continues to build other US-market models domestically: the EQE and EQS SUVs at Vance, and the Sprinter van in South Carolina. The company has not announced a revised timeline for any other model as part of this change, and it has not said whether the 2030 start could move again.

For buyers, the near-term GLC on sale in the US is unaffected by the rescheduling: the delay concerns when the next-generation car will be built in Alabama, not whether the current one is available. The question the announcement leaves open is how Mercedes sources the next-generation GLC for US customers between late 2027 and May 2030, and the company has not detailed that.

Open this article ↗

Keep scrolling to read the next story.

Older articles →